This article is meant for one thing and one thing only. It aims to shed light onto a few yet-not-looked-into facts that are seemingly open loopholes in the "equal weightage" and "normalisation" systems that have been adopted in the implementation and publication of Kerala Engineering Entrance Exam of KEAM 2011. This will be an expose of the flaws in simple yet convincing words so that you don't have to complete a degree to just understand this whole aritcle. References have been given to all related articles some directly from KEAM website and to a few reliable news sources.
FIRST OF ALL, ITS NOT EQUAL WEIGHTAGE
For the preparation of Engineering Rank list, equal weightage was given to
the marks obtained in the Entrance Examination for Engineering (Paper I &
Paper II put together) and the grade/marks obtained for Mathematics, Physics and
Chemistry/Computer Science/Biotechnology/Biology put together in the Second
year of the qualifying examination (Plus Two or equivalent), after effecting the
normalization procedure as described in Clause 9.7.4 (b)(ii) of the Prospectus. (Page 2- Highlights of KEAM 2011) see more
No, its not equal weightage. Its sounds fine: entrance marks are taken out of 500 and boards out of 500. The end result will be out of 1000 where each of the exams were given 50-50 weightage, right? WRONG!
Think this: a typical exam would be of maximum marks say 100. We have three subjects here: Physics, Chemistry and Maths. So our total marks of boards will be out of 300. This value gets converted its equal corresponding value of a maximum marks of 500, according to the Prospectus. Lets see an example..
Suppose my score was 80 in Phy, 90 in Chem and 75 in Math after normalisation. My total now would be 245 out of 300. This will translate to 408.3333 out of 500 according to the rules. The important thing here to notice is that my marks, now after rules implementation has INCREASED from 245 to 408.3333.
Now take a look at my sample entrance score.. Lets say I have a total score of 400 marks from my Paper I (Physics and Chemistry) and Paper II (Mathematics). Thats 400/960 which will translate into 208.3333. Here keep in mind my entrance score has DECREASED.
Lets put it together: my board marks get increased when converted into a 500 marks score whereas my entrance score has decreased while both are maintained at a grand total of 1000. This means every one mark I score in entrance has less value than the one mark I scored in my board exam. Take a look:
Board exam 1 mark conversion: (1 / 300 ) * 500 = 1.6667
Entrance exam 1 mark conversion: (1/960) * 500 = 0.5208
Clearly, though it is supposed to be equal weightage, my score for Entrance has less value than that of my Board exam (in fact, it has halved! ). Conclusion: Equal weightage does not exist. You can fool a layman by saying its both out of 500 and hence it must have equal value.. . In reality, a little 5th grade Math does not agree.
NOTE: Only in the case of OISCA Academy Senior High School, Japan and Tamil Nadu Board of Higher Secondary Education is the total greater than 500 (each subject being of max mark 200). In this case the marks of the students will decrease.
SECONDLY, NORMALISATION PROCESS IS UNJUST
In an article published in The Hindu a paragraph reads:
NOTE: Only in the case of OISCA Academy Senior High School, Japan and Tamil Nadu Board of Higher Secondary Education is the total greater than 500 (each subject being of max mark 200). In this case the marks of the students will decrease.
SECONDLY, NORMALISATION PROCESS IS UNJUST
In an article published in The Hindu a paragraph reads:
Dr. Krishnan said that any swing — either upward or downward — of scores in various streams would be evened out during the process of normalisation, as it would be applied equally to all candidates in that stream.
This is perfectly acceptable given data is collected from every board that has candidates from appearing for the exam. However, this was not the case. Frankly I'm impressed that they got so far. It shows they put in a lot of effort. CEE Kerala got data from boards such as United States Office of Education, Illinois and National University of Singapore. But a few were reported to be missed out (source will be provided on next update). These students' marks has been compared to that of CBSE values. So the actual "normalisation" does not take place. If they had a tougher exam than the CBSE and their mean value was substantially lower (or higher) than that of CBSE (note here even one mark average is important as seen in the above case) justice is well.. not served. Even though its a minority case, they are students too. They wrote the exams too. They deserve the right normalisation too.
This implies the very reason for implementation of normalisation procedure fails as these values taken- though 'standard', are on a false base.
THIRDLY, AFTER NORMALISATION AVERAGES WILL VARY FROM INITAL EXPECTATIONS
This I found out on the day of declaration of result. Its difficult to explain all the math involved here but here is what happens:
Person 1 has 80,90 and 60 in Phy, Chem and Math respectively.
Person 2 has 60, 60 and 70 in the exams.
Their total after converting to 500 without normalisation will be around 383 and 316 respectively.
But after normalisation based on the data, it was found that Person 1 has around 9 marks less (374) and Person 2 has slightly more lets say a 0.6 marks gain.
Notice here that Person 1 has lost a good 9 marks from normalisation. If you don't see that happening, you can take my word for it. It has happened. Take a look at who else is complaining about this.
I can only say : "wierd".
The future of a lot of smart students is at stake. It is for us citizen to ensure that these kids get where they deserve to be. The Entrance exams were brought in so that there would be a fresh system free from previous errors for admission to colleges. Change with reason and well researched solutions is perfectly acceptable. But as of now there is none so significant to have the method revised. If the present government is convinced of the shortcomings of the newly adopted system, it should do away with the new system and publish the ranking based on the Entrance marks alone. This will not only create order in a world of chaos but will ensure that the in future more thought will be put in before any revolutionary plan is put to practice.
NOTE: If you disagree with the points above, state so in the comments section with a link to a reliable source or with convincing proof; I'll be only happy to be enlightened on my bad. Have anything to add? Feel free..
This article will be updated soon. Stay tuned.
Image: Fingers Pointing - Teerapun / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Image: Tick jscreationzs / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
This implies the very reason for implementation of normalisation procedure fails as these values taken- though 'standard', are on a false base.
THIRDLY, AFTER NORMALISATION AVERAGES WILL VARY FROM INITAL EXPECTATIONS
This I found out on the day of declaration of result. Its difficult to explain all the math involved here but here is what happens:
Person 1 has 80,90 and 60 in Phy, Chem and Math respectively.
Person 2 has 60, 60 and 70 in the exams.
Their total after converting to 500 without normalisation will be around 383 and 316 respectively.
But after normalisation based on the data, it was found that Person 1 has around 9 marks less (374) and Person 2 has slightly more lets say a 0.6 marks gain.
Notice here that Person 1 has lost a good 9 marks from normalisation. If you don't see that happening, you can take my word for it. It has happened. Take a look at who else is complaining about this.
I can only say : "wierd".
The future of a lot of smart students is at stake. It is for us citizen to ensure that these kids get where they deserve to be. The Entrance exams were brought in so that there would be a fresh system free from previous errors for admission to colleges. Change with reason and well researched solutions is perfectly acceptable. But as of now there is none so significant to have the method revised. If the present government is convinced of the shortcomings of the newly adopted system, it should do away with the new system and publish the ranking based on the Entrance marks alone. This will not only create order in a world of chaos but will ensure that the in future more thought will be put in before any revolutionary plan is put to practice.
NOTE: If you disagree with the points above, state so in the comments section with a link to a reliable source or with convincing proof; I'll be only happy to be enlightened on my bad. Have anything to add? Feel free..
This article will be updated soon. Stay tuned.
Image: Fingers Pointing - Teerapun / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Image: Tick jscreationzs / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
